|
|
|
OB 321 Supplemental
Organizational Communication
Pointer
versus Associater Worksheet
What feelings,
tastes, sounds, sights and smells do the following elicit?:
1. Laundry
2. Wood burning
3. Hot tar
4. Shampoo
5. Paper
6. Thanksgiving
7. The ocean
8. Popcorn
9. National
anthem
10. Dirt
11. Boss
12. Mother
Back to Top
Riddles
Worksheet
The beginning
of eternity,
the end of
time and space.
The beginning
of every end,
the end of
every race.
This is: ___________________________________________________________________
Thirty white
horses on a red hill,
First they
champ,
Then they
stamp,
Then they
stand still
This is: ___________________________________________________________________
Forward I
am heavy, backward I'm not. What am I?
How does a
baseball player hold a bat?
How many successful
jumps must a skydiver make before (s)he graduates?
Make a 5 letter
word from these letters:
H
I J K L M N O
How many months
have 28 days?
This sentense
contain three errors. What are they?
Back to Top
Neologisms
Worksheet
Neology refers
to the new use of words, phrases or expressions. It can take the form
of:
word coinage
... creation
of new word
... acronyms,
e.g., PB, LLNL, ATT, KFC
... combining
parts of existing words, e.g., stalkarazzi
... compress
existing words, e.g., hi-tech
... make generic
word from proper name, e.g., sandwich
... make generic
word from fictional character, e.g., Hercules
... make generic
word from a trade name, e.g., jello
... borrow
from another language, e.g., paparazzi
... make common
words used by specific groups, e.g., bagel
orusage
coinage
... creation
of new meanings
... constant
piling on of meanings ----> confusion, e.g., heavy
... etymological
shifts... changes over time, e.g., gay
... regional
variation... within and between cultures, e.g., sack/bag,
... technical
vs common usage, e.g., buzzwords
Define each
of the following and identify the neologism.
| benchmarking
|
floppy
|
milestone
|
| quality circle
|
hood
|
e-commerce
|
| outsource
|
Colombian
|
drag
|
| online
|
rightsize
|
girlfriend
|
| position
|
boyz
|
CEO
|
| rotary
|
knowledge worker
|
snail mail
|
| java
|
mini
|
moptop
|
| macro
|
drive
|
techie
|
| hard copy
|
whitewater
|
tush
|
| queue
|
hot
|
turnover
|
| development
|
slot
|
Candy Cane
|
| sort
|
stalk
|
rap
|
| HMO
|
menu
|
hit
|
| alpha
|
disco
|
soul mate
|
Back to Top
Patterns
of Miscommunication
Don't
Confuse Me With Facts
Manifestations
of the Syndrome
Fantasy versus
Fact
1. The inference-observation
(I-O) paradigm
1.1 X makes
an assumption
1.2 X forgets
that this assumption is an inference, not truth
1.3 X doesn't
calculate the associated (emotional, communication, dollar, etc.)
risks
1.4 X acts
on the assumption as if it were truth
1.5 X takes
(emotional, communication, dollar, etc.) risks, with uncertain consequences
2. Activating
the I-O paradigm
2.1 Emotionally
loaded situation... stress
2.2 Impaired
senses... physical limitations
2.3 Physiology...
hunger, thirst, fatigue
2.4 Closed-mindedness...
attitudes, beliefs, opinions, values
2.5 *Language*
2.51 Use
of same words to make inferential and observational statements
2.52 Contributes
to confusion over what is inference and what is observation
2.53 Can
lead to "talking apples and oranges"
Internal
versus External Frame of Reference
1. Intensional
orientation
1.1 Confusion
over or forgetting the difference between
1.11 Words
as symbols versus the "event" itself
1.12 Maps
versus territories
1.13 Fantasy
versus reality
1.14 Imagined
versus real
1.15 Fiction
versus fact
1.2 Concerned
over what's going on inside versus what's going on outside
1.21 Feelings,
attitudes, assumptions, beliefs, theories, etc at the expense of
external (to self) events
1.3 Cultural
conditioning
1.31 Traditions,
mores, values passed on and maintained
1.32 Can
vary from culture to culture and within a culture
1.33 Mores
change over time... e.g.,
... job
for life versus pay for performance
... planned
obsolescence versus conservation and recycling
... Reubenesque
versus "supermodelesque" notions of female attractiveness
1.4 Impact
of language
1.41 Language
merely a tool... to symbolize events
1.42 English
a particularly imprecise tool
1.43 Influenced
by and influence of cultural values, e.g.,
... sexist
language -----> sexist attitudes -----> sexist intensionalism
Leap Before
You Look
1. Making and
acting on premature decisions and judgments
1.1 Act first,
think later
2. A function
of...
2.1 ... culture
----> the American way, e.g., Quickdraw McGraw, fast on the uptake
2.2 ... habit
----> adaptation
2.3 ... fear
----> panic
3. Distinguish
between
3.1 Reflex
responses... behavior controlled by involuntary nervous system, e.g.,
eyeblink
3.2 Voluntary
responses... behavior controlled by voluntary nervous system, e.g.,
raise your right hand
3.3 Reflex-like
responses... behavior controlled by voluntary nervous system but appearing
to be controlled by involuntary nervous system, e.g., learned, routinized
tasks such as driving
3.31 Sometimes
with positive outcomes, sometimes negative
CORRECTING
THE SYNDROME
How to deal
in fact vs fantasy
-
Separate
fact from fiction
-
Calculate
the risk of making a false assumption(s)... possible impact on
-
my communication
-
my behavior
-
my thoughts,
beliefs, opinions
-
my feelings,
attitudes, values
-
Get more
information about the situation and the individuals involved
-
Recalculate
the risks
-
Own your
inferences
-
Consciousness
and awareness
-
think
before you act
-
consider
the options
-
Make decisions
based on minimal risk
How to have
an external frame of reference
How to Look
Before You Leap
-
Very few
emergencies that require instant action
-
Practice
waiting
-
Take it
slow
-
See the
humor
-
Anticipate
the emergency... plan alternatives in advance
-
Anticipate
others' snap decisions
Adapted from
Haney, William V. (1992)Communications and Interpersonal Relations(6th ed.). Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Back to Top
Patterns
of Miscommunication
I Didn't
Mean to Be Speaking
While You
Were Interrupting
Manifestations
of the Syndrome
You Say
Kneether, I Say Neyether
1. Sender/receiver
miss each other with their meanings
1.1 Same words
have different meanings or interpretations, e.g., usually, sometimes,
input
1.2 Different
words for the same thing, e.g., productivity-output
1.3 Can be
deliberate intention of sender/receiver
... to be
evasive
... to say
nothing
2. Consequences
2.1 Range
from humor to wasting time, effort, dollars to conflict
2.2 Apparent
agreement
2.21 Act
on false assurance of agreement
2.3 Apparent
disagreement
2.31 Wasted
energy thinking there is disagreement when none actually exists
3. Underlying
mechanism... why bypassing occurs
3.1 Assumption
X makes that words mean the same thing to Y
3.11 Because
we frequently communicate effectively, we become overly confident
and complacent in our use of language
3.12 We
want and need to feel/be understood and to understand others
3.13 Basic
egocentrism of human beings... "Well, that's what I would have meant!"
3.2 Faulty
assumption of words have only one meaning or are used only one way
(mono-usage, when many words are used in multiple ways, e.g., satisfaction,
reward, performance
3.21 Related
to neology... how things are named
3.22 Word
coinage... creation of new word
... acronyms,
e.g., PB, LLNL, ATT, KFC
... combining
parts of existing words, e.g., stalkarazzi
... compress
existing words, e.g., hi-tech
... make
generic word from proper name, e.g., sandwich
... make
generic word from fictional character, e.g., Hercules
... make
generic word from a trade name, e.g., jello
... borrow
from another language, e., paparazzi
... make
common words used by specific groups, e.g., bagel
3.23 Usage
coinage... create new meanings
... constant
piling on of meanings ----> confusion, e.g., heavy
... etymological
shifts... changes over time, e.g., gay
... regional
variation... within and between cultures, e.g. sack/bag, bonnet
/hood
... technical
vs common usage, e.g., buzzwords
3.3 Faulty
assumption that words have meaning
3.31 Words
themselves are only noise
3.32 Words
have no inherent meaning... only labels
3.33 People
attribute meaning... meaning varies as people vary
... will
argue over what they think is truth
... define
a word and then act accordingly, from their own frame of reference
Thinking
Inside the Box
1. Blindering
1.1 Tendency
to restrict one's view of a problem
1.2 Viewing
a problem one way excludes other views
1.3 Constraints
applied in defining a problem
1.31 Can
be our thoughts, beliefs, attitudes about the problem... e.g., who's
on first
1.32 Can
be the words we use to conceptualize the problem... incorrect or
inappropriate label for it... e.g., GRID versus AIDS
1.4 Can lead
to delays in solving a problem or to faulty solutions
1.41 (Faulty)
assumptions about the problem
... I need
more time and resources because the problem is difficult
... I don't
have enough information
... it's
not worth my time and energy, so I can't be bothered
... it can't
be solved
... this
isn't the problem, THIS is
1.5 Deadlines
frequently become blinders
1.51 Distinguish
those that are...
... real...
imposed from outside and cannot be delayed
... self
imposed
... a result
of procrastination
Door #1
vs Door #2
1. Language
(words) as tool
1.1 Pointer...
to call attention to something
1.2 Associaters...
evoke memories (thoughts) and reactions (emotions)
2. Confusion
over words as pointers or associaters
2.1 Matrix
versus continuum
2.11 Same
words, depending on time/place/situation, serve both functions
2.2 Sometimes
used to manipulate
2.21 By
anyone attempting create an illusion of reality that suits his/her
own purpose
... by politicians
... by advertisers
... by business
... by John
and Jane Doe
2.22 Works
when people are gullible enough to forget to distinguish
2.3 Euphemisms
2.31 Attempt
to create positive or inoffensive associations, e.g.,
... re-engineering
replaces downsizing, replaces reduction in force, replaces
layoffs
... administrative
assistant or associate versus secretary
... vintage
gelatin silver prints versus old black and white photos
... preowned
automobile replaces used car
2.4 Dysphemisms
2.41 Attempt
to create negative associations
... Joe Camel
symbolizes the "evils" of smoking
2.5 Name calling
2.51 Labeling
someone by a characteristic or trait
2.52 Often
creates a double burden... the trait and the evaluation of self
2.53 Frequently
we live up to or live down the label... can be a positive or negative
label
2.54 Remember...
... words
are only symbols ----> sticks and stones
... labels
help to describe not identify
... look beyond
the label, e.g., "beauty is only skin deep"
3. Associative
bypassing
3.1 Tendency
to miss someone's associative meanings
3.2 Can occur
when...
... sender
assumes because (s)he is pointing, receiver knows it
... sender
assumes because (s)he is associating, receiver will know it
... sender
or receiver assume same associative meaning held by the other
3.3 A fact of
communication life
... be aware,
careful and "thoughtful"
Correcting
the Syndrome
How not to
kneether/neyether
-
Be person-minded
vs word-minded
-
Query and
paraphrase
-
Be approachable
-
Use alternative
communication strategies, e.g., written, e-mail, face-to-face
-
Consider what
you're about to say
-
Review what
you've just said
-
Wait a while
(especially for emotionally loaded communication)... sleep on it
-
Be sensitive
to context
How to think
outside the box
-
Encourage
divergent rather than convergent thinking early on
-
Talk with
an outsider... clean, unencumbered perspective, e.g., "fresh blood"
-
Avoid language
that stops thought and creativity , e.g., we've always done it this
way, should
-
Brainstorming
-
Nominal group
or Delphi technique
-
Alternative
thought processes
-
circular
as well as linear thinking... start where you are
-
reverse
decisions
-
start at
the end... work back from where you want to end up
-
look at
constraints as opportunities
-
Start over
by redefining (reconceptualizing) the problem
-
am I asking
the right question
-
am I looking
at this in a set way or for what it is
-
what are
the parts as well as the whole
-
Recognize
you're stuck and behaving like a needle stuck in a groove
Adapted from Haney,
William V. (1992)Communications and Interpersonal Relations (6th ed.).
Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Back to Top
Patterns
of Miscommunication
It's All
About Me
Manifestations
of the Syndrome
Arrogance
1. Know-it-all
attitude... arrogant, overly self-assured (aggressive vs assertive)
1.1 In thought...
categorical, absolute, dogmatic
1.2 In communication...
closed, curt, terse
1.3 Can be conscious...
errors of omission... create the reality you want
2. Based on two
fallacious assumptions
2.1 It's possible
to know or say everything about something
2.2 I'm saying
it... I know what's important, period
3. Contributing
factors to making faulty assumptions
3.1 Abstracting
3.11 Attending
to some details at the expense of others
3.12 Believing
that we are attending to all of them or all that are worth knowing,
e.g., target marketing
3.13 The higher
one is in the bureaucracy, the greater the abstracting... know less
and less about operational details
3.2 Psychology...
archetypal
3.21 Need
for certainty
3.22 Discomfort
with ambiguity
3.23 Internal
and external sources of insecurity
3.24 Leads
to...
... premature
judgment
... dogmatism
and/or skepticism
... oversimplification
and denial of complexity
4. Manifestations
of allness
4.1 When we
stress a particular point of view... consider only our own frame of
reference
4.11 Assume
we've covered it all
4.12 Assume
we know the most salient points
4.13 Examples...
letters to the editor, departmental in-fighting
4.2 Stereotyping
4.21 Assume
experience with few generalizes to all
4.22 Closed
to experiencing the whole... stop learning
4.3 Insularity
and closed-mindedness
4.31 Assume
we know all there is to know
4.32 The "what
good will it do me to...." attitude
4.33 Path
of least resistance... rely on what's safe, comfortable, familiar
4.34 Closed
to anything new or different... resistance to learning, stretch, change
Stereotyping
1. Indiscrimination
1.1 Behavior
that fails to recognize variation, nuance between people, events, objects
1.2 Inability
or unwillingness to separate or distinguish like or similar people,
events, objects from one another
1.3 Overemphasis
on or overlooking of similarities at the expense of the differences
1.31 Noting
commonalities helps in abstract reasoning and decision making
2. Categorization
2.1 Classifying
of people, events, objects
2.2 Problematic
when classifications get "set in stone" and prevent further analysis
3. Stereotypes
3.1 Fixed image
of a class of people, events, objects
3.2 Every individual
assigned characteristics of the class or group
3.3 Failure
to discriminate the differences between people, events, objects
3.4 "rule of
thumb" at best to "judgmental prejudice" at worst
4. Roots of stereotyping
4.1 Emotional
protection
4.11 Fear
of unknown
4.12 Fear
of differences
4.13 Build
self up at expense of other or diminish oneself in comparison to other
4.2 Structure
of language
4.21 English
stresses similarities as opposed to differences
4.22 Abundance
of generic nouns or verbs vs discriminating terms, e.g., labor, management,
technology
4.23 Add our
own perceptions and definitions to generic words ----> stereotyping
Either-Or
1. Dichotomy
1.1 Presentation
of only two alternatives
1.2 Real dichotomy
1.21 Genuine
contradiction
1.22 One alternative
must occur and the other cannot
1.23 Either-or
situation ----> no in-between
... either
you had juice this AM or you didn't
... you either
read this book or you didn't
1.3 False dichotomy
l.31 Imagined
or seeming contradiction
l.32 Many
possible in-between states ----> degrees, gradations, nuance
1.33 Usually
true with psycho-social phenomena
... life or
death
... male or
female
... productive
or unproductive
... pro-union
or anti-union
2. Polarization
2.1 Treating
a false dichotomy as a real dichotomy
2.2 Failure
to discriminate degrees of difference
3. Consequences
and dangers
3.1 Delusional
thinking ----> the "there's only one way" syndrome
3.11 Self
----> if I'm not "this" then I'm nothing
3.12 Others
----> "everybody" does it or sees it this way
3.2 Divisiveness
3.21 The "you're
either with me or against me" syndrome
3.22 "Two
sides to every story" is illusory
3.3 Accusations
of "wishy-washy"
3.31 The "take
a stand" syndrome
3.4 Cessation
of critical thinking and learning
3.41 The "right
thinking" syndrome
3.42 Ideas
become the victim
3.43 Sacrifice
interpretation and judgment----> spirit of the law vs letter of the
law
3.5 Going to
extremes ---> the vicious pendulum effect
3.51 The "blowing
things out of proportion" syndrome
4. Roots of polarization
4.1 Emotional
protection ----> same dynamics as stereotyping
4.11 Fear
of unknown
4.12 Fear
of differences
4.13 Build
self up at expense of other or diminish oneself in comparison to other
4.2 Structure
of language
4.21 English
stresses opposites at expense of intermediate terms, while those that
do are vague
Forever
1. Ossification
of opinions, attitudes, beliefs, behavior relative to self, others, events,
objects
1.1 Failure
to take change into account
1.2 Assume the
way it was/is is the way it always will be
1.3 The past
dictates the future
1.4 Closure
distortions
2. Roots of frozen
evaluation
2.1 Emotional
protection ----> resistance to change
2.11 Fear
of unknown
2.12 Keep
us inside our comfort zone
2.13 Minimize
stress
2.14 Maintain
ability to predict
2.2 Language
2.21 Implication
of permanence
2.22 Use of
words that don't imply movement
2.23 Use of
words that are not time-bound
Correcting
the Syndrome
How not to
stereotype
-
Become more
aware of differences ----> consciousness
-
Internalize
the premise of "uniqueness" ----> no two people, events, objects are
alike
-
Index evaluations
----> practice discrimination, ask "which" question
How not to
either-or
-
Distinguish
between real and false dichotomies ----> consciousness
-
Index evaluations
----> practice discrimination, ask "how much" question, be as specific
as possible, e.g., in the productive-unproductive false dichotomy
-
Use substantive
or quantifying intermediate terms when specificity not possible
-
good manager
----> competent, thorough, detailed, open, etc
-
competent
----> somewhat, frequently, etc
-
Separate multiple
false dichotomies
-
Guard against
going to extremes
-
most issues
are complex
-
there is
no one reality, only the perception of reality
-
distinguish
between questions of fact and questions of feeling
-
reverse
roles
-
keep the
discussion away from the personal
-
keep calm
-
own and
identify your opinions, feelings, etc
How not to
forever
-
Be aware that
change is the only given ----> consciousness
-
Management
theory and practice
-
Index evaluations
----> practice discrimination, ask "when" question
Adapted from Haney,
William V. (1992)Communications and Interpersonal Relations (6th ed.).
Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Back to Top
|
|